Tomsk, Russian Federation
The term public diplomacy remains ambiguous in academic discourse. Its heterogeneous interpretations have to be systematized to enhance the analysis of its practices. This article offers such a classification of definitions based on different methodological approaches (systemic vs. practice-oriented) and schools (conservative, liberal, intermediate) in Russian and foreign research traditions. The review involved 43 publications (2003–2023). Their qualitative and quantitative content analysis focused on five definitional components (essence, subject, object, purpose, tasks) and three secondary characteristics (geography, approach, school). Quantitatively, 71.8% of the authors used non-systemic terms (instrument, process, etc.), while only 28.2% appealed to systemic ones (policy, set of measures, etc.). The research revealed some significant discrepancies: Russian researchers mostly adopted the systemic approach (42.0%) and the conservative school (65.0%), whereas foreign scholars favored the practice-oriented approach (92.0%) and the intermediate school (39.1%). The conceptual landscape of public diplomacy needs a universal theoretical framework for all contextual differences to expand the empirical base and confirm the trends identified in this research. The findings provide a foundation for critical literature analysis and constructive dialogue on various methodologies applied to Russia’s public diplomacy.
public diplomacy, terminology, theoretical conceptualization, research methodology, civil diplomacy, propaganda, soft power, academic discourse
1. Bahriev B. H. Public diplomacy in contemporary research discourse. Bulletin of TSULBP. Series of Social Sciences, 2017, (1): 131–147. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/yrpwpb
2. Dolinskiy A. V. Public diplomacy discourse. International Trends, 2011, 9(1): 63–73. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ohioin
3. Cull N. J. Public diplomacy: Lessons from the past. Los Angeles: Figueroa, 2009, 62.
4. Gregory B. Public diplomacy: Sunrise of an academic field. ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2008, 616(1): 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311723
5. Gilboa E. Searching for a theory of public diplomacy. ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2008, 616(1): 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207312142
6. Borishpolets K. P. Public diplomacy in EEU region: Understanding the phenomenon and its development. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 2015, (5): 42–55. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/uxabyb
7. Burlinova N. V. Public diplomacy in Russia: Practice and problems of establishment. Vestnik Analitiki, 2014, (3): 28–35. (In Russ.)
8. Burlinova N. V., Vasilenko P. I., Ivanchenko V. S., Shakorov O. I. Ten steps to efficient public diplomacy in Russia. Expert review of Russian public diplomacy in 2018–2019. Moscow: RIAC, 2020, 58. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/btvzuu
9. Lebedeva M. M. Social and humanitarian issues in international studies: The Russian perspective. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 2018, (1): 7–25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2018-1-58-7-25
10. Tsvetkova N., Rushchin D. Russia’s public diplomacy: From soft power to strategic communication. Journal of Political Marketing, 2021, 20(1): 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2020.1869845
11. Leonard M., Stead C., Smewing C. Public diplomacy. London: The Foreign Policy Centre, 2002, 183.
12. Yun S.-H. Toward public relations theory-based study of public diplomacy: Testing the applicability of the excellence study. Journal of Public Relations Research, 2006, 18(4): 287–312. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1804_1
13. Kuznetsov N. M., Tsvetkova N. A. Russian data diplomacy: Goals, trends, perspectives. RGGU Bulletin. "Political Science. History. International Relations" Series, 2022, (1): 26–40. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/dwgcug
14. Marchukov A. N. Public diplomacy 2.0 as a tool of foreign political activity. Science Journal of Volgograd State University. History. Area Studies. International Relations, 2014, (4): 104–113. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu4.2014.4.10
15. Lebedeva M. M. Soft power: The concept and approaches. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 2017, (3): 212–223. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2017-3-54-212-223
16. Nye J. S. Public diplomacy and soft power. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2008, 616(1): 94–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311699
17. Zonova T. V. Diplomacy: Models, forms, and methods. 2nd ed. Moscow: Aspekt Press, 2017, 348. (In Russ.)
18. Kubyshkin A. I., Tsvetkova N. A. U.S. public diplomacy. Moscow: Aspekt Press, 2013, 271. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/sdtoxr
19. Lebedeva M. M. Conceptual transformations of public diplomacy. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 2020, 13(5): 293–306. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2020-5-74-293-306
20. Cull N. J. Public diplomacy before Gullion: The evolution of a phrase. Routledge handbook of public diplomacy, eds. Snow N., Cull N. J. 2nd ed. NY: Routledge, 2020, 13–18.
21. Russia’s public diplomacy: Evolution and practice, eds. Velikaya A. A., Simons G. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020, 285. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12874-6
22. Löffelholz M., Auer C., Krichbaum S., Srugies A. Advancing public diplomacy from a global citizenship perspective: An empirical study on how state and non-state actors address foreign citizens in a globalised world. Vietnam Social Sciences, 2017, (1). URL: https://vjol.info.vn/index.php/VSS/article/view/28527 (accessed 4 Mar 2025).
23. Kuznetsov N. M. U.S. diplomacy in the era of big data: New goals and opportunities. USA & Canada: Economics, Politics, Culture, 2022, (3): 98–111. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S2686673022030063
24. Fominykh A. E. Public diplomacy in public history: American exhibitions in the USSR as perceived by soviet people (1959–1991). Dnevnik Altaiskoi shkoly politicheskikh issledovanii, 2018, (347): 34–40. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/yoefkx
25. Loiko L. V. The basics of diplomacy: Diplomatic service. Misnk: BSU, 2008, 255. (In Russ.)
26. Lebedeva O. V. Modern methods and practices of diplomacy. Moscow: Aspekt Press, 2021, 237. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/njmgwg
27. Lukin A. V. Public diplomacy. The International Affairs, 2013, (3): 69–87. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/shooeh
28. Velikaya A. A. Public diplomacy of Russia and the United States. Moscow: Aspekt Press, 2023, 192. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/yworzp
29. Konkov A. E., Chukov R. S. Parliamentary diplomacy: Developing relations between society and state at the mega-political level. Polis. Political Studies, 2020, (1): 62–73. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.01.05
30. Prostakishina E. V., Konstantinova M. A. International image of Chinese People’s Republic. Rossiya i Kitai: Problemy strategicheskogo vzaimodeistiya, 2011, (9): 75–78. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/nuhxdn
31. Podberezkin A. I., Zhukov A. V. Public diplomacy in power clash of civilizations. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 2015, (6): 106–116. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vhixmn
32. Bahriev B. H. Soft power and public diplomacy: Opportunities for independent Tajikistan. Tomsk State University Journal, 2018, (436): 97–105. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/436/11
33. Borishpolets K. P. Public diplomacy in EEU region: Understanding the phenomenon and its development. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 2015, (5): 42–55. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/uxabyb
34. Lebedeva M. M. Public diplomacy in conflict resolution. International Trends, 2015, 13(4): 45–56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2015.13.4.43.3
35. Harkevich M. V. Military dimension of public diplomacy. Public diplomacy: Theory and practice, ed. Lebedeva M. M. Moscow: Aspekt Press, 2017, 21–35. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/zwaovh
36. The new public diplomacy: Soft power in international relations, ed. Melissen J. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005, 221. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230554931
37. Dolinskiy A. V. Evolution of the theoretical foundations of public diplomacy. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 2011, (2): 275–280. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/nttzun
38. Østevik M., Godzimirski J. M. How to understand and deal with Russian strategic communication measures? Oslo: NUPI, 2018. URL: https://nupi.brage.unit.no/nupi-xmlui/handle/11250/2490552?locale-attribute=en (accessed 4 Mar 2025).
39. Gregory B. American public diplomacy: Enduring characteristics, elusive transformation. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 2011, 6(3-4): 351–372. https://doi.org/10.1163/187119111X583941
40. Artamonova U. Z. COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges and opportunities for Russian and American public diplomacy. USA & Canada: Economics, Politics, Culture, 2021, (6): 89–110. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S268667300015221-3
41. Vershinin I. The role of discursive practices in public diplomacy and international relations: The case of Russia–Japan relations. Europe-Asia Studies, 2023, 75(9): 1560–1578. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2023.2244200
42. Nitoiu C., Pasatoiu F. Public diplomacy and the persistence of the conflict and cooperation dichotomy in EU-Russia relations. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 2023, 31(1): 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2022.2100983
43. Tuch H. N. Communicating with the world: U.S. public diplomacy overseas. NY: St. Martin’s Press, 1990, 224.
44. Nazarova R. O. Russia’s public diplomacy in the context of confrontation with the West: Problems and prospects of sports diplomacy. Russia’s foreign policy interests: History and modernity: Proc. XI All-Russian Sci.-Prac. Conf., Samara, 28 Apr 2023. Samara: SAMARAMA, 2023, 128–134. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/yziznx
45. Fominykh A. Russian public diplomacy through higher education. Russia’s public diplomacy: Evolution and practice, eds. Velikaya A. A., Simons G. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020, 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12874-6_7
46. Zhang C., Zhang D., Blanchard P. International broadcasting during times of conflict: A comparison of China’s and Russia’s communication strategies. Journalism Practice, 2024, 18(8): 1977–2004. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2022.2140445
47. Zöllner O. A quest for dialogue in international broadcasting: Germany’s public diplomacy targeting Arab audiences. Global Media and Communication, 2006, 2(2): 160–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766506061817
48. Tsvetkova N. A. U.S. web public diplomacy. USA & Canada: Economics, Politics, Culture, 2011, (3): 109–122. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/nduowr
49. Bjola C., Cassidy J., Manor I. Public diplomacy in the digital age. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 2019, 14(1-2): 83–101. http://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-14011032
50. Duncombe C. Digital diplomacy: Emotion and identity in the public realm. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 2019, 14(1-2): 102–116. http://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-14101016
51. Krasnyak O. Foreign ministry’s spokesperson in public diplomacy: A case of Russia. Russian Journal of Communication, 2020, 12(2): 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/19409419.2020.1780630
52. Manor I. The Russians are laughing! The Russians are laughing! How Russian diplomats employ humour in online public diplomacy. Global Society, 2021, 35(1): 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2020.1828299
53. Anholt S. Public diplomacy and place branding: Where’s the link? Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 2006, 2(4): 271–275. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.pb.6000040
