Yevpatoria, Russian Federation
To be applied effectively, grammar rules needs to be properly structured and generalized. It is a relevant psychological, pedagogical, scientific, and methodological issue of contemporary linguistic education. This article introduces a new methodology that allows secondary school teachers of Russian to structure and visualize rules about auxiliary words as logical schemes, tables, and algorithms. The new method provides seven-graders with a holistic vision of grammar rules. As a result, they develop strong skills of communicative grammar in speaking and writing. Logical schemes, tables, and algorithms optimize the process of learning Russian grammar. The case features functional and auxiliary words. However, the method is universal and can be applied to other lexical and grammatical categories.
analysis, generalization, systematization, grammatical and semantic structuring, grammatical material, Russian language lesson
1. Levushkina O. N. Technologization as a modern trend in Russian education. Modern technologies in teaching Russian: Proc. Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Moscow, 2–3 Oct 2020. Moscow: MSPU, 2020, 79–82. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ncgtqq
2. Antonova L. V., Antonov V. I., Burzalova T. V. Generalization as a way of forming students theoretical thinking. Bulletin of Buryat State University, 2009, (15): 7–9. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/kysxaj
3. Vorontsova N. D. Description of didactic basis, methods and means for the formation of generalization and concepts systematization of students. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2015, (7): 28–33. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/uaosur
4. Tsarenkova V. V., Shpanovskaya S. I. Logical structuring of teaching material as a means of systematization and generalization of knowledge. Trudy BGTU. No 5. Istorija, filosofija, filologija, 2014, (5): 180–182. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/xerhpx
5. Dyatlova E. N. Organization of generalization of social and humanitarian knowledge acquisition (based on the materials of experimental work). Review of Omsk State Pedagogical University. Humanitarian research, 2021, (3): 113–118. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36809/2309-9380-2021-32-113-118
6. Kvaskova L. V. Fundamentals of functional grammar: Communicative-pragmatic aspect. Moscow: MSPU, 2016, 160. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/jiarnn
7. Sultanbaeva H. V. Auxiliary parts of speech in linguistics. Bulletin of Bashkir University, 2012, 17(1-1): 554–555. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/peguib
8. Perfilyeva N. P. The communicative and pragmatic potential of prepositions. Vestnik Novosibirsk State University. Series: History, philology, 2012, 11(11): 132–136. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/pngeul
9. Raevskaya M. V. Theoretical problems of studying prepositions in Russian linguistics. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Linguistics, 2014, 11(2): 21–24. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/skbbop
10. Shirshikova A. A. On the problems of the preposition in the modern Russian language. Modern communications: Language. Man. Society. Culture, eds. Khramushina Zh. A., Popova T. V., Shagaeva A. A. Ekaterinburg: UMC UPI, 2012, 49–55. (In Russ.)
11. Dudina Yu. A. The main Russian comparative conjunctions in the diachronic aspect. Science at South Ural State University: Proc. 66 Sci. Conf., Chelyabinsk, 15–17 Apr 2014. Chelyabinsk: SUSU, 2014, 1609–1615. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/sndriz
12. Priyatkina A. F., Starodumova E. F. Paradigmatic and syntagmatic aspects of conjunctions and particles. Humanities Research in the Russian Far East, 2012, (2): 20–24. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ozymmr
13. Nagornyy I. A. Grammatical-communicative functions of the Russian particles in the speech sphere. Belgorod State University Scientific Bulletin. Humanities, 2019, 38(3): 369–378. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18413/2075-4574-2019-38-3-369-378
14. Klyushina A. M. The ability of Russian particles to communicate the semantics of the extreme: An analytical review. Philology. Theory & Practice, 2022, 15(7): 2174–2182. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20220377
15. Krasnova E. A. On actual direction of linguopoetics: Russian conjunctions in text service (history of issue). Scientific Dialogue, 2019, (7): 70–78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2019-7-70-88
16. Vinogradova E. N., Klobukova L. P. Preposition: The biggest challenges of a small part of speech. RUDN Journal of Russian and Foreign Languages Research and Teaching, 2017, 15(3): 299–316. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2264-2017-15-3-299-316
17. Krivorotova E. V. Formation of system of argumentative skills of students in solving cognitive tasks on the grammar material. Modern technologies in Russian language teaching: Proc. Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Moscow, 2–3 Oct 2020. Moscow: MSPU, 2020, 157–161. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/jnyzym
18. Vekkesser M. V., Mamaeva S. V., Slavkina I. A., Shmulskaya L. S. The latest technologies for teaching Russian at school. Krasnoyarsk: SFU, 2020, 108. (In Russ.)
19. Gatz I. Yu. Methods of teaching the Russian language in assignments and exercises. 2nd ed. Moscow: Iurait, 2019, 260. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/utelst
20. Tikhomirova K. M, Kudina I. Yu. Complex of teaching aids from the positions of modern pedagogical science. Lomonosov Pedagogical Education Journal, 2018, (3): 61–77. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51314/2073-2635-2018-3-61-77
21. Fatkhutdinova V. G. Morphology of the Russian language: Beyond the significant parts of speech. Kazan: Otechestvo, 2016, 80. (In Russ.)
22. Hodyakova L. A. Mastering analytical and synthetic skills in the context of culture in teaching Russian as a condition for self-realization of a student's creative personality (concept). Modern technologies in Russian language teaching: Proc. Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Moscow, 2–3 Oct 2020. Moscow: MSPU, 2020, 100–106. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/awjawr
23. Fursova L. V., Velichko I. V. Union means of the Russian language. Tavrichesky scientific observer, 2016, (1-3): 219–220. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vlldpd
24. Muryasov R. Z. Grammatical peculiarities of particles. Bulletin of Bashkir University, 2018, 23(2): 515–521. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/iauykh
25. Savelyeva L. A. The role of particles in cohesion and coherence of text. Bulletin of Bashkir University, 2018, 23(1): 225–232. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/wbvgol
26. Deykina A. D., Zhuravleva L. I., Pakhnova T. M. Workshop on the Russian language: Punctuation: Algorithms. Reminders. Tables. Exercises. Moscow: Verbum-M, 2004, 221. (In Russ.)
27. Zhuravleva L. I. Punctuation. Russian language in algorithms. 2nd ed. Chelyabinsk: Vzglyad, 2010, 60. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qvclbx
28. Klyukhina I. V. Russian language in algorithms and schemes. Moscow: Vako, 2018, 66. (In Russ.)
29. Nadtochiy E. D. Algorithms in teaching orthography of contemporary Russian language. Uchenye zapiski Tavricheskogo Natsionalnogo Universiteta im. V. I. Vernadskogo. Series: Filology. Social communications, 2012, 25(1-2): 304–307. (In Russ.)
30. Chernoraeva T. V., Hoffman V. S., Nikiforova A. N., Didenko A. S. Russian language. All the rules are in the algorithms. Rostov-on-Don: Feniks, 2018, 32. (In Russ.)
31. Zaporozhskaya K. V. Application of modern pedagogical technologies in education. Modern pedagogical technologies and innovations: Regional pedagogical readings, Omsk, 25 Oct 2023. Omsk: BPOU "OPK No. 1", 2023, 29–33. (In Russ.)
32. Boguslavsky M. V., Milovanov K. Yu., Ovchinnikov A. V. Effective pedagogical practices of the Soviet school. Moscow: Institute of Content and Methods of Teaching, 2024, 95. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ghvwim
