KEY BENCHMARKS FOR FINANCIAL RECOVERY OF COMMODITY PRODUCERS IN THE REGIONAL SYSTEM OF ANTI-CRISIS MANAGEMENT: AGRICULTURAL ORGANIZATIONS OF THE KEMEROVO REGION
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
This publication addresses the challenges of financial recovery for commodity producers at the stages of identifying and preventing pre-crisis situations. The research objective was to identify and describe the key benchmarks for financial recovery for commodity producers within the regional crisis management system. The study included individual intra-corporate processes and their patterns while taking into account the external influences. A previously developed selective-indicative model for express diagnostics of bankruptcy risks provided statistical data. The regional and industry-specific model covered large and medium-sized agricultural organizations in the Kemerovo Region, Russia. The research started with sampling, interpretation, and classification (direct indicators) of bankruptcy risks, which were then correlated with typical bankruptcy criteria. After structuring the bankruptcy risks into commercial risks and unbalanced liquidity risks, the authors recorded the metrics of structural risk components. Next stage involved a synthesis of direct bankruptcy risk indicators into a diagnostic structure to develop a gradation scale for the model. The operational bankruptcy risk instruments were structured as a pyramid that included bankruptcy criteria, structural components of bankruptcy risks, analytical vectors of anti-crisis diagnostics, direct bankruptcy indicators, bankruptcy signal analytical base (factors of preferred growth and decline), and quantitative bankruptcy factors. The model was tested on data obtained from 38 local enterprises. They were differentiated by bankruptcy risk level (≥ 50 vs. ≤50 %). After that, each enterprise was provided with crisis fields and key benchmarks for financial recovery, as well as fundamental areas of economic impact to strengthen the financial status of regional economic entities. The key benchmarks for the financial recovery of commodity producers (crisis management levers) were identified using a system of operational tools and general bankruptcy risk metrics based on the crisis areas identified in the producers’ activities. Pre-trial recovery should become a standard strategy aimed at restoring the regulatory solvency levels. Factors for the growth of equity capital and the sources (elements) of its formation were identified as fundamental benchmarks for the financial sustainability of regional agricultural enterprises. Insufficient equity capital is a serious and wide-spread financial problem. It explains the current government restrictive monetary policy, which stimulates the expansion of producers’ equity capital.

Keywords:
Anti-crisis management, financial health, financial recovery, key benchmarks, bankruptcy risk, default risk, regional and industrial specification
Text
Text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Chernichenko SG, Kotov RM. Methodological tools for diagnosing insolvency (bankruptcy) of organizations in the anti-crisis management system. Food Processing: Techniques and Technology. 2020;50(4):588–601. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2074-9414-2020-4-588-601

2. Chernichenko SG, Kotov RM. Synthesized methodological technologies in the field of insolvency (bankruptcy) diagnostics of organizations in the anti-crisis management system (based on materials from agricultural organizations in the Kemerovo region - Kuzbass). Kemerovo: Kemerovo State University; 2023. 118 p. (In Russ.)

3. Chernichenko SG, Kotov RM. Express diagnostics of bankruptcy risks based on a selective-indicative model. Food Processing: Techniques and Technology. 2024;54(1):167–177. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2074-9414-2024-1-2498

4. Kryukov AF, Egorychev IG. Crisis forecasting methods for commercial organizations: Financial indicators. Management in Russia and Abroad. 2001;(2):18–31. (In Russ.)

5. Abdullayeva PR, Bandurina NV, Voronina YuM. Bankruptcy legislation: Continuity and innovation. Moscow: Yustitsinform; 2023. 348 p. (In Russ.)

6. Barilenko VI. Comprehensive analysis of economic activity. Moscow: Yurayt; 2023. 455 p.

7. Zhdanov VYu. Bankruptcy risk diagnostics. Moscow: Prospekt; 2022. 159 p. (In Russ.)

8. Ryakhovskaya AN. Bankruptcy and financial recovery of economic entities. Moscow: Yurayt; 2023. 153 p. (In Russ.)

9. Andrianov AO, Kozlova EE, Bubnova OYu, Solovyev OD. Sustainable growth of companies and corporations: Trends and assessment. The Financial Economy. 2019;(1):287–289. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/YVZPRB

10. Nikiforova NA, Dontsova LV. Risks: The analytical aspect. The Bryansk State University Herald. 2014;(3):263–269. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/TMESHJ

11. Nikiforova NA, Dontsova LV, Dontsov YeV. Intellectual data analysis methods used for building companies’ financial performance models. Budget and treasury academy of the ministry of finance of the Russian federation. Journal of Finance. 2021;(2):5–18. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/NEKRTV

12. Kazakov AV, Kolyshkin AV. The development of bankruptcy prediction models in modern Russian economy. St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies. 2018;34(2):241–266. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu05.2018.203

13. Fedorova EA, Musienko SO, Fedorov FYu. Analysis of the external factors influence on the forecasting of bankruptcy of russian companies. St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies. 2020;36(1):117–133. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu05.2020.106

14. Shadrina GV. Management and financial analysis. Moscow: Yurayt; 2023. 316 p. (In Russ.)

15. Gorbatkov SA, Farkhiyeva SA, Beloliptsev II. Neural network and fuzzy modeling methods for diagnosing and forecasting corporate bankruptcy. Moscow: Prometey; 2018. 371 p.

16. Mizanbekova SK, Bogomolova IP, Shatohina NM. Prospects for digital and innovative technologies in management competitiveness of enterprises. Food Processing: Techniques and Technology. 2020;50(2):372–382. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2074-9414-2020-2-372-382

17. Khamskaya SG. Credit risk assessment in commercial lending: Direct borrowings between enterprises: Diss. Cand. Sci. Eng.: 08.00.10. Novosibirsk, 2006. 193 p. (In Russ.)

18. Altman E, Hotchkiss E. Corporate financial distress and bankruptcy: Predict and avoid bankruptcy, analyze and invest in distressed debt. NY: John Wiley & Sons; 2021. 307 p.

19. Kücher A, Mayr S, Mitter C, Duller C, Feldbauer-Durstmüller B. Firm age dynamics and causes of corporate bankruptcy: Age dependent explanations for business failure. Review of Managerial Science. 2018;14;633–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-018-0303-2

20. Newton GW. Bankruptcy and insolvency accounting: Practice and procedure. NY: John Wiley & Sons; 2009. 554 p.

21. Chernichenko SG, Gilmulina SA, Dudinskaya TK, Shcheglova MA. Main components of the strategy «factor» management aggregate credit exposure as an alternative risk management reception. Advances in modern science and education. 2016;2(10):57–63. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/XCGVED


Login or Create
* Forgot password?