employee
Moskva, Russian Federation
student
Moskva, Russian Federation
The research featured the political role of the Nord Stream 2 project in Russian foreign policy and in building constructive relations with Russia's partners in the European Union. The paper describes the strategy, tactics, forms, and methods involved in the cross-border pipeline project implemented by Russia and its foreign partners. The focus is on the political relations between the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Russian state-owned corporations, foreign governments, and foreign multinational corporations, i.e. the negotiations within the international consortium. The research objective was to identify the role of cross-border pipeline projects in Russian foreign policy in Europe. The methodological basis included system and comparative-political approaches, as well as the methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, and deduction. The methods of political comparativistics revealed how the competing parties were able to affect the negotiations and implementation of Nord Stream 2. The method of system analysis made it possible to examine the interactions between the state structures and the oil and gas companies. The authors identified the conflict directions between the supporters and the opponents of the project, as well as between the Russian Federation and the United States of America. The paper describes the political tools that promote the interests of the project in conditions of acute rivalry in the energy area. The Russian Federation and Gazprom managed to bring the project to its final stage. However, the success would have been impossible without the help of their European partners.
Russian Federation, European Union, Gazprom, gas, liquid hydrocarbons, politics
1. Pirani S., Yafimava K. Russian gas transit across Ukraine past-2019: pipeline scenarios, gas flow consequences and regulatory restrictions. Oxford, 2016, 75. DOI:https://doi.org/10.26889/9781784670542
2. Gulyaev M. M. Development of energy cooperation of Russia and the EU: results of the first two decades of dialogue. Economics, 2017, (9): 38-42. (In Russ.)
3. Belov V. B. The Nord Stream-2 project - chances and risks of implementation. Nauchno-analiticheskiy vestnik IE RAN, 2018, (3): 74-80. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.15211/vestnikieran320187480
4. Murgas R. Ia. Reverse gas to Ukraine: the essence of the problem and its impact on international relations in the energy sector. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, 2017, (4): 272-288. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2017-4-55-272-288
5. Urazgaliev V. Sh., Titkov M. V. A gas component of energy security of Russia. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ekonomika, 2018, 34(2): 176-216. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu05.2018.201
6. Voloshin V. I. US energy policy and Russia-EU cooperation in oil and gas supply. Rossijskij vneshneekonomicheskij vestnik, 2018, (9): 58-75. (In Russ.)
7. Zhiznin S. Z., Timokhov V. M. Energy impact on sustainable development. Mirovaia ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia, 2017, 61(11): 34-42. DOI:https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-11-34-42
8. Skalamera M. Energy security in the wake of the Ukraine crisis: getting the real threats right. Global Policy Essay, 2015. Available at: https://www.globalpolicyjournal.com/articles/climate-change-energy-and-sustainability/energy-security-wake-ukraine-crisis-getting-real-t (accessed 10.12.2019).
9. Gudkov I. V. Nord Stream - 2: revisiting the "political expediency" of the project. Vsia evropa, 2017, (3). Available at: http://alleuropalux.org/?p=14379 (accessed 08.12.2019).
10. Grigas A. The new geopolitics of natural gas. Harvard University Press, 2017, 416.
11. Yergin D. The quest, ed. Evstigneeva I., Matsak O. Moscow: Alpina pablisher, 2017, 718. (In Russ.)
12. Zemuri M., Haroun T., Safa A. The approaches of Russia and Algeria to deliveries of the liquefied natural gas to European markets. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Ekonomika, 2013, (S5): 223-232. (In Russ.)
13. Giniyatov F. M. Expansion of NATO in the East and the position of Russia. Vestnik ekonomiki prava i sotsiologii, 2012, (1): 176-178. (In Russ.)
14. Mitrova T., Sobko A., Sergeeva Z. Transforming the global LNG market: the window of opportunities is closing for Russia.Moscow: Energeticheskii tsentr Moskovskoi shkoly upravleniia SKOLKOVO, 2018, 59. (In Russ.)
15. Zhiznin S. Z., Timokhov V. M. Technological aspects of Russian energy diplomacy. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, 2016, (3): 43-53. (In Russ.)
16. Konoplianik A. A., Orlova E. S., Larionova M. S. Evolution of the pricing system in the world energy market: economic consequences for Russia. Moscow: Ekonomicheskii fakultet MGU imeni M. V. Lomonosova, 2017, 428. (In Russ.)
17. Asmakova A. T. New level of Russian-Chinese cooperation in energy (the case of "Power of Siberia"). Aktualnye problemy sovremennykh mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii, 2015, (6): 149-153. (In Russ.)
18. Ivanov N. A. The Shale America: US energy policy and development of unconventional oil and gas resources. Moscow: Magistr, 2014, 302. (In Russ.)
19. Seleznev P. S., Shaposhnikov A. I. Lobbying in the oil and gas sector of modern Russia. Vlast, 2017, 25(5): 122-129. (In Russ.)
20. Simoniia N. A. Energy dimension of world politics. Modern political science: methodology. 2nd ed., eds. Gaman-Golutvina O. V., Nikitin A. I.; 2nd ed. Moscow: Aspekt Press, 2019, 614-628. (In Russ.)
21. Motyashov V. P. Gaz and geopolitics: the chance for Russia. Moscow: URSS, 2017, 352. (In Russ.)
22. Koziel S., Hobohm J., Falkenberg H., Mellahn S. Current status and perspectives of the European gas balance: analysis of EU 28 and Switzerland. Berlin, 2017, 94.
23. Gamzalov S. D. Russian-German relations: specifics and prospects for development. Vlast, 2010, (6): 156-159. (In Russ.)
