Kemerovo, Kemerovo, Russian Federation
Kemerovo, Kemerovo, Russian Federation
Marketing complex acquires a new content as it tries to adjust itself to the changing business practices and consumer behavior. The research objective was to study the content of Marketing 4.0 and the changing relationship between the brand and the consumer. The authors conducted a comparative analysis of the changes in marketing concepts, which proved that consumers have become partners in marketing communications. Internet communities and opinion leaders proved to affect consumer behavior. Social networks and messengers shape attitude of whole communities. The research revealed an increasing role of customization and personalization in the promotion of brands and products in the era of digitalization. Consumer experience and pleasure derived from marketing interaction are becoming more and more important. Previously obtained materials made it possible to define the change in the marketing complex in the digital economy from 4P to 4C. New consumer communities search for information on the Internet, thus overlooking traditional methods of marketing communications.
digital marketing, marketing complex, marketing communications, sales, consumer, loyalty
1. Kotler P., Kartajaya H., Setiawan I. Marketing 4.0: Moving from traditional to digital. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley, 2017, 208.
2. Krauss M. Marketing 4.0 argues the marketplace has changed, and the customer is in control. Marketing News, 2017, 51(4): 26-27.
3. Mukherjee J. Philip Kotler, Hermawan Kartajaya, and Iwan Setiawan: Marketing 4.0, ISBN: 978-1-119-34120-8. Published by: Wiley, 2017. Vilakshan: The XIMB. Journal of Management, 2017, (14): 111-112.
4. Wu L., Liu H. Tracing fake-news footprints: Characterizing social media messages by how they propagate. WSDM '18: Proc. of the Eleventh ACM Intern. Conf. on Web Search and Data Mining. N. Y.: ACM, 2018, 637-645. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3159652.3159677
5. Tarabasz A. The reevaluation of communication in customer approach - Towards Marketing 4.0. International Journal of Contemporary Management, 2013, 12(4): 124-134.
6. Verhoef P. C., Beckers S. F. M., van Doorn J. Understand the perils of co-creation. Harvard Business Review, 2013, 91(9): 28.
7. Varey R. J., McKie D. Staging consciousness: Marketing 3.0, post-consumerism and future pathways. Journal of Customer Behavior, 2010, 9(4): 321-334. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1362/147539210X543538
8. Kotler P., Kartajaya H., Hooi D. H. Marketing for competitiveness: Asia to the world: In the age of digital consumers. London: WSPS, 2017, 302.
9. Kotler P., Kartajaya H., Setiawan I. Marketing 3.0: From products to customers to the human spirit. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley, 2010, 208.
10. Hadiyati E. Study of marketing mix and AIDA model to purchasing on line product in Indonesia. British Journal of Marketing Studies, 2016, 4(7): 49-62.
11. Wei P.-Sh., Lu H.-P. An examination of the celebrity endorsements and online customer reviews influence female consumers' shopping behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 2013, (29): 193-201.
12. Kono S. From the marketers' perspective: The interactive media situation in Japan. Television goes digital, ed. Gerbarg D. N. Y.: Springer, 2009, vol. 1, 57-59.
13. Tien D. H., Rivas A. A. A., Liao Y.-K. Examining the influence of customer-to-customer electronic word-of-mouth on purchase intention in social networking sites. Asia Pacific Management Review, 2018, 23(4): 1-12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2018.06.003
14. Sugiyama K., Andree T. The Dentsu way: 9 lessons for innovation in marketing from the world's leading advertising agency. N. Y.: McGraw-Hill, 2011, 310.
15. Yan K.-L., Yu Y.-L. The study on the implementation and effectiveness of Active Aging Learning Center in Taoyuan Elementary School. School Administrators Research, 2015, (99): 174-201.
16. Sims J. M. Communities of practice: Telemedicine and online medical communities. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2018, 126(C): 53-63. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.030
17. Gómez-Suárez M., Martínez-Ruiz M. P., Martínez-Caraballo N. Consumer-brand relationships under the Marketing 3.0 paradigm: A literature review. Frontiers in Psychology, 2017, (8). DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00252
18. Dessart F. J., Bavel R. Two converging paths: Behavioral sciences and social marketing for better policies. Journal of Social Marketing, 2017, 7(4): 355-365. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/JSOCM-04-2017-0027
19. Achar C., So J., Agrawal N., Duhachek A. What we feel and why we buy: The influence of emotions on consumer decision-making. Current Opinion in Psychology, 2016, (10): 166-170. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.01.009
20. Jackson G., Ahuja V. Dawn of the digital age and the evolution of the marketing mix. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice, 2016, (17): 170-186. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1057/dddmp.2016.3
