FEATURES OF TERRITORIAL ADMINISTRATION SYSTEM IN RUSSIAN FEDERATION: NATIONAL PROJECTS AND MUNICIPAL INSTRUMENTS
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
The article analyses national projects as a key element of the Russian territorial administration system and reviews management tools of regional and municipal executive authorities. The object of research is a system of territorial management. The subject is the peculiarities of the program and municipal methods application in a territorial management system. The goal is to determine the nature of the territorial administration system transformations and the role of municipal instruments in it. The authors use methods of systematic historical and institutional analysis. After systemic transformations, national projects are adapting to new economic and political conditions. Municipal instruments are relevant measures that have not yet been applied at the federal level, or have been applied to a limited extent. Regional or municipal authorities independently develop measures to improve management processes, which can later be applied at the federal level. Often such initiatives are designed to promote government transparency, establish communication channels between the state and society, optimize the interdepartmental interaction, improve the state institutions' tools of information and data management, etc. The key disadvantage is differences in the results due to lack of a unified approach to their application.

Keywords:
territorial administration, program methods, strategic planning, digitalization, social networks, region, information analysis systems
Text
Publication text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Bednyakov A. S., Mierin L. A. National projects of Russia: problems and solutions. Izvestia Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta, 2019, (4): 20-25. (In Russ.) EDN: RHIDRA

2. Sadykova A. V., Mironova N. G. Digitalization and documentation support of management in Russia. Forum molodezhnoi nauki, 2020, 1(6): 66-73. (In Russ.) EDN: WVCWCE

3. Oborin M. S. Digitalization as a factor of management transformation for regional economic systems. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo, 2020, 13(3): 91-101. (In Russ.) EDN: NZVXND

4. Salabutin A. V. Issues of digitalization of municipal government: trends and problems. Science without borders, 2020, (5): 139-144. (In Russ.) EDN: TBFMIW

5. Sholin Yu. A., Kulik A. A., Sholina E. A. Application of the project approach in the management of territorial development. Moscow Economic Journal, 2019, (13): 594-605 (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/2413-046X-2019-10322

6. Semin A. N. Territorial development of the region in the conditions of project management and cluster economy. ETAP: Economic Theory, Analysis, and Practice, 2019, (3): 25-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/2071-6435-2019-10087

7. Perkova M. V., Rodiashina K. E. Strategic territorial planning in the Russian Federation: the main ways of development and management. Bulletin of Belgorod state technological university named after V. G. Shukhov, 2016, (9): 77-82. (In Russ.) EDN: WLSVCZ

8. Medvedeva O. V., Paramonova M. G. Digitization of management and electronic document management systems. Uchenye zapiski Tambovskogo otdeleniia RoSMU, 2019, (13): 75-80. (In Russ.) EDN: VTCWEE

9. Zelentsova S. Yu., Galyuta O. N. Implementation of national digitalization projects state administration in the subjects of the Russian federation. Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society of Russia, 2021, 231(5): 238-255. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.38197/2072-2060-2021-231-5-238-255

10. Stroev P. V., Pivovarova O. V. Project approach as a necessary condition for implementing effective management of socio-economic development of municipalities. Kreativnaya ekonomika, 2021, 15(6): 2661-2672. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18334/ce.15.6.112241

11. Stroev P. V., Kashin V. K., Pivovarova O. V., Reshetnikov S. B., Lapenkova N. V. Information support of geoinformation modeling of spatial development (the case of the TASED in the Khabarovsk territory). Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research, 2019, 5(3): 60-81. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21684/2411-7897-2019-5-3-60-81

12. Skidan A. V., Chipiga Yu. A., Isiuk A. A. Digitalization as a factor of increasing public administration performance: problems and directions of development. State and municipal administration scientific notes, 2021, (1): 71-76. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2021-1-1-71-76

13. Rybakova M. V., Ivanova N. A. Digitalization of management as a factor of effective interaction between the state and society. Sotsiologiia, 2021, (5): 157-164. (In Russ.) EDN: ULBXUQ

14. Gubanov A. V., Zotov V. V. Social networks as a new tool of state and municipal management in the Russian Federation. Communicology, 2017, 5(4): 83-92. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2017-5-4-83-92

15. Zubarev S. M., Ivanov A. V. Socio-political risks of digitalization and their impact on public administration. Science. Culture. Society, 2021, 27(4): 76-91. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19181/nko.2021.27.4.7

16. Kosorukov A. A. Digital tools for the response of public authorities to destructive and deviant informational occasions. Conflict Studies / nota bene, 2021, (3): 48-63. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0617.2021.3.36879

17. Vershinina M. A. Digital channels of interaction between government and society: new communication practices and technology selection. Public Administration. E-journal (Russia), 2021, (87): 61-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/2070-1381-2021-87-61-71

18. Tushakova E. A. The role of social media in the interaction of government and society (on the example of the Regional Management Center of the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous District. Communicology: electronic scientific journal, 2022, 7(1): 17-27. (In Russ.) EDN: ZKLETU

19. Shcherbakova M. P. Digitalization of social management. Iuridicheskaia nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoĭ akademii MVD Rossii, 2020, (1): 207-209. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36511/2078-5356-2020-1-207-209

20. Yakovlev-Chernyshev V. A. Digitalization of state administration in the Russian Federation: advantages and risks. NB: Administrative Law and Administration Practice, 2021, (2): 42-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.7256/2306-9945.2021.2.36011

21. Berman S. S. Analysis of digitalization of public administration: regional context. Regionalnye problemy preobrazovaniia ekonomiki, 2021, (7): 104-111. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26726/1812-7096-2021-7-104-111

22. Likhtin A. A. Transformation of public administration in the digital era. Administrative consulting, 2021, (4): 18-26. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-4-18-26

23. Korzh A. E., Sychanina S. N. Modern systems of interaction of authorities with civil institutions in the conditions of digitalized economy. Economy and Business: theory and practice, 2021, (1-1): 170-172. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/2411-0450-2021-1039

24. Zotov V. V., Vasilenko L. A. The digitalization influence on the transformation of public administration methodology. Administrative Consulting, 2021, (5): 98-109. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-5-98-109

25. Plotnikov V. A., Masliuk A. V. Prospects for digitalization of public administration processes. Administrative consulting, 2022, (3): 87-94. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2022-3-87-94


Login or Create
* Forgot password?