Екатеринбург, Россия
Уральский государственный аграрный университет
Башкирский государственный аграрный университет
Екатеринбург, Россия
Екатеринбург, Россия
Екатеринбург, Россия
Екатеринбург, Россия
Екатеринбург, Россия
Екатеринбург, Россия
К основным факторам, снижающим эффективность перорального применения биопептидов и белков относятся ферментативная деградация в ЖКТ, прохождение через слизистый слой, селективный барьер из эпителиальных клеток, кислая среда желудка и низкий период полувыведения. В связи с этим биологически активные белковые молекулы не могут эффективно использоваться в качестве функциональных пищевых ингредиентов в составе продуктов питания профилактического и лечебного назначения. Цель исследования – проанализировать научные направления и стратегии, способствующие решению проблемы нестабильности пептидов и белков в ЖКТ при пероральном применении. Объектами исследования выступали научные публикации, посвященные пероральному применению, стабильности и биодоступности пептидов и белков в ЖКТ. Проведен систематический поиск в базах данных eLIBRARY.RU, MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Europe PMC, Scopus, Web of Science и Google Scholar за период 2020–2025 гг. (с включением фундаментальных более ранних работ). Из 1346 первоначально найденных результатов после ручного отбора в обзор включено 116 статей, касающихся повышения стабильности белков и пептидов в ЖКТ. Установлено, что инкапсуляция пептидов в липидные (твердые липидные наночастицы, наноструктурированные липидные носители, липосомы) и полимерные наноносители повышает стабильность и биодоступность при пероральном применении. Клеточно-проникающие пептиды и их интеграция с различными носителями лекарственных средств позволяют создавать многофункциональные системы доставки. Перспективным направлением является использование модифицированных микроорганизмов (модифицированных живых биотерапевтических продуктов) для адресной доставки пептидов и белков. Разрабатываются методы амплификации матриксных белков, а также стратегии создания пептидов для перорального введения с применением ингибиторов протеаз, усилителей проницаемости, химической модификации и циклизации. В результате собственных исследований получен нативный противовирусный пептид. Его инкапсулирование в мальтодекстрин повысило стабильность в кишечнике на модели in vitro в 1,8 раза. Также синтезированы новые циклические биопептиды и рекомбинантный белок, доказано их биологическое действие в экспериментах in vitro.
Пептиды, белки, пероральная доставка, клеточно-проникающие пептиды, усовершенствованная микробная терапия, усилители проницаемости, полимерные системы, инкапсуляция, липидные носители
1. Wu J, Roesger S, Jones N, Hu C-MJ, Li SD. Cell-penetrating peptides for transmucosal delivery of proteins. Journal of Controlled Release. 2024;366:864–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.01.038
2. Pang H, Huang X, Xu ZP, Chen C, Han FY. Progress in oral insulin delivery by PLGA nanoparticles for the management of diabetes. Drug Discovery Today. 2023;28(1):103393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2022.103393
3. Wang YY, Li H, Rasool A, Wang HB, Manzoor R, et al. Polymeric nanoparticles (PNPs) for oral delivery of insulin. Journal of Nanobiotechnol. 2024;22(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-023-02253-y
4. Salama NN, Eddington ND, Fasano A. Tight junction modulation and its relationship to drug delivery. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2006;58(1):15–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2006.01.003
5. Zou J-J, Wei G, Xiong C, Yu Y, Li S, et al. Efficient oral insulin delivery enabled by transferrin-coated acid-resistant metal-organic framework nanoparticles. Science Advances. 2022;8(8):eabm4677. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abm4677
6. Zhu X, Shan W, Zhang P, Yun J, Shan G, et al. Penetratin derivative-based nanocomplexes for enhanced intestinal insulin delivery. Molecular Pharmaceutics. 2014;11(2):317–328. https://doi.org/10.1021/mp400493b
7. Smart AL, Gaisford S, Basit AW. Oral peptide and protein delivery: Intestinal obstacles and commercial prospects. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery. 2014;11(8):1323–1335. https://doi.org/10.1517/17425247.2014.917077
8. Goldberg M, Gomez-Orellana I. Challenges for the oral delivery of macromolecules. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2003;2(4):289–295. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd1067
9. Drucker DJ. Advances in oral peptide therapeutics. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2020;19(4):277–289. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-019-0053-0
10. Han Y, Gao Z, Chen L, Kang L, Huang W, et al. Multifunctional oral delivery systems for enhanced bioavailability of therapeutic peptides/proteins. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B. 2019;9(5):902–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2019.01.004
11. Miao Y-B, Xu T, Gong Y, Chen A, Zou L, et al. Cracking the intestinal lymphatic system window utilizing oral delivery vehicles for precise therapy. Journal of Nanobiotechnology. 2023;21:263. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-023-01991-3
12. Dubey SK, Parab S, Dabholkar N, Singhvi G, Argrawal M, et al. Oral peptide delivery: Challenges and the way ahead. Drug Discovery Today. 2021;26(4):931–950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2021.01.001
13. Fallingborg J. Intraluminal pH of the human gastrointestinal tract. Danish Medical Bulletin. 1999;46(3):183–196. https://elibrary.ru/YCCJSX
14. Chen G, Kang W, Li W, Chen S, Gao Y. Oral delivery of protein and peptide drugs: From non-specific formulation approaches to intestinal cell targeting strategies. Theranostics. 2022;12(3):1419–1439. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.61747
15. Buckley ST, Bækdal TA, Vegge A, Maarbjerg SJ, Knudsen LB, et al. Transcellular stomach absorption of a derivatized glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist. Science Translational Medicine. 2018;10(467):eaar7047. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aar7047
16. Johansson MEV, Thomsson KA, Hansson GC. Proteomic analyses of the two mucus layers of the colon barrier reveal that their main component, the Muc2 mucin, is strongly bound to the Fcgbp protein. Journal of Proteome Research. 2009;8(7):3549–3557. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr9002504
17. Leon DL, Crouzier T, Sarkar A, Dunphy L, Han J, et al. Spatial configuration and composition of charge modulates transport into a mucin hydrogel barrier. Biophysical Journal. 2013;105(6):1357–1365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2013.07.050
18. Brunner J, Ragupathy S, Borchard G. Target specific tight junction modulators. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2021;171:266–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2021.02.008
19. Yang NJ, Hinner MJ. Getting across the cell membrane: An overview for small molecules, peptides, and proteins. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2015;1266:29–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2272-7_3
20. Kristensen M, Nielsen HM. Cell-penetrating peptides as carriers for oral delivery of biopharmaceuticals. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicol. 2016;118(2):99–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcpt.12515
21. Salamat-Miller N, Johnston TP. Current strategies used to enhance the paracellular transport of therapeutic polypeptides across the intestinal epithelium. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2005;294(1–2):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2005.01.022
22. Lee B, Moon KM, Kim CY. Tight junction in the intestinal epithelium: its association with diseases and regulation by phytochemicals. Journal of Immunology Research. 2018;2018:2645465. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2645465
23. Antosova Z, Mackova M, Kral V, Macek T. Therapeutic application of peptides and proteins: Parenteral forever? Trends in Biotechnology. 2009;27(11):628–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.07.009
24. Ensign LM, Cone R, Hanes J. Oral drug delivery with polymeric nanoparticles: The gastrointestinal mucus barriers. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2012;64(6):557–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2011.12.009
25. Canales C, Shleider С, Roque-Borda A, Cazorla JIM, Cazorla RMM, et al. Forging a new frontier: Antimicrobial peptides and nanotechnology converging to conquer gastrointestinal pathogens. Small. 2025;21(26):e2501431. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202501431
26. Zarrintaj P, Ghorbani S, Barani M, Chauhan NPS, Yazdi MK, et al. Polylysine for skin regeneration: A review of recent advances and future perspectives. Bioengineering & Translational Medicine. 2021;7(1):e10261. https://doi.org/10.1002/btm2.10261
27. Yaghmur A, Mu H. Recent advances in drug delivery applications of cubosomes, hexosomes, and solid lipid nanoparticles. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B. 2021;11(4):871–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2021.02.013
28. Jansook P, Fülöp Z, Ritthidej GC. Amphotericin B loaded solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) and nanostructured lipid carrier (NLCs): Physicochemical and solid-solution state characterizations. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy. 2019;45(4):560–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/03639045.2019.1569023
29. Su L, Zhou F, Yu M, Ge R, He J, et al. Solid lipid nanoparticles enhance the resistance of oat-derived peptides that inhibit dipeptidyl peptidase IV in simulated gastrointestinal fluids. Journal of Functional Foods. 2020;65:103773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2019.103773
30. Salvi VR, Pawar P. Nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) system: A novel drug targeting carrier. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology. 2019;51:255–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2019.02.017
31. Elmowafy M, Al-Sanea MM. Nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) as drug delivery platform: Advances in formulation and application. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal. 2021;29(9):999–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2021.07.015
32. Jain P, Rahi P, Pandey V, Asati S, Soni V. Nanostructured lipid carriers: A modish contrivance to overcome the ultraviolet effects. Egyptian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 2017;4(2):89–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbas.2017.02.001
33. Nelson AL, Mancino C, Gao X, Choe JA, Chubb L, et al. β-catenin mRNA encapsulated in SM-102 lipid nanoparticles enhances bone formation in a murine tibia fracture repair model. Bioactive Materials. 2024;39:273–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.05.020
34. Akbari A, Saeedi M, Ahmadi F, Hashemi SMH, Babaei A, et al. Solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers: a review of the methods of manufacture and routes of administration. Pharmaceutical Development and Technology. 2022;27(5):525–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/10837450.2022.2084554
35. Chauhan I, Yasir M, Verma M, Singh AP. Nanostructured lipid carriers: A platform to lipophilic drug for oral bioavailability enhancement. Advanced Pharmaceutical Bulletin. 2020;10(2):150–165. https://doi.org/10.34172/apb.2020.021
36. Ehlers APF, Bartholomä J, Menghin D. Rechtliche Regelung der „Triage“ – Gesundheitssysteme an ihren Grenzen. Medizinrecht. 2021;39(5):416–423. [Ehlers APF, Bartholomä J, Menghin D. Legal regulation of "triage" health care systems at their borders. Medical Law. 2021;39(5):416–423. (In German)] https://doi.org/10.1007/s00350-021-5874-2
37. Fernández-Barat L, Ciofu O, Kragh KN, Pressler T, Johansen U, et al. Phenotypic shift in Pseudomonas aeruginosa populations from cystic fibrosis lungs after 2-week antipseudomonal treatment. Journal of Cystic Fibrosis. 2017;16:222–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcf.2016.08.005
38. Rehman KU, Zaman U, Alem A, Khan D, Khattak NS, et al. Alkaline protease functionalized hydrothermal synthesis of novel gold nanoparticles (ALPs-AuNPs): A new entry in photocatalytic and biological applications. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2024;265:131067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.131067
39. Silva APB, Roque-Borda CA, Carnero Canales CS, Duran Gleriani Primo LM, Silva IC, et al. Activity of bacteriophage D29 loaded on nanoliposomes against macrophages infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Diseases. 2023;11(4):150. https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases11040150
40. Almeida A, Souto E. Solid lipid nanoparticles as a drug delivery system for peptides and proteins. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2007;59(6):478–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2007.04.007
41. Thapa RK, Diep DB, Tønnesen HH. Nanomedicine-based antimicrobial peptide delivery for bacterial infections: Recent advances and future prospects.Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation. 2021;51(4):377–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40005-021-00525-z
42. Makowski M, Silva ÍC, Pais do Amaral C, Gonçalves S, Santos NC. Advances in lipid and metal nanoparticles for antimicrobial peptide delivery. Pharmaceutics. 2019;11(11):588. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics11110588
43. Cantor S, Vargas L, Rojas A, Yarce C, Salamanca C, et al. Evaluation of antimicrobial peptide incorporated liposomes coated with Eudragit E-100 against foodborne pathogens. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019;20(3):680. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20030680
44. Alzahrani NM, Booq RY, Aldossary AM, Bakr AA, Almughem FA, et al. Liposome-encapsulated tobramycin and IDR-1018 peptide mediated biofilm disruption and enhanced antimicrobial activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(5):960. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14050960
45. Zhao H, Sun J, Cheng Y, Nie S, Li W. Advances in peptide/polymer antimicrobial assemblies. Journal of Materials Chemistry B. 2025;13(5):1518–1530. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4TB02144D
46. Spirescu VA, Chircov C, Grumezescu AM, Andronescu E. Polymeric nanoparticles for antimicrobial therapies: An up-to-date overview. Polymers (Basel). 2021;13(5):724. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13050724
47. Fredenberg S, Wahlgren M, Reslow M, Axelsson A. The mechanisms of drug release in poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)-based drug delivery systems – a review. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2011;415(1–2):34–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.05.049
48. Sur S, Rathore A, Dave V, Reddy KR, Chouhan RS, et al. Recent developments in functionalized polymer nanoparticles for drug delivery. Nano-Structures & Nano-Objects. 2019;20:100397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoso.2019.100397
49. Giordani B, Basnet P, Mishchenko E, Luppi B, Škalko-Basnet N. Utilizing liposomal quercetin and gallic acid in localized treatment of vaginal Candida infections. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12:9. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12010009
50. Muthukrishnan L. Nanonutraceuticals – challenges and novel nano-based carriers for effective delivery and enhanced bioavailability. Food and Bioprocess Technology. 2022;15:2155–2184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-022-02807-2
51. Zhuo S, Zhang F, Yu J, Zhang X, Yang G, et al. pH-sensitive biomaterials for drug delivery. Molecules. 2020;25(23):5649. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25235649
52. Roque-Borda CA, Saraiva MSM, Macedo Junior WD, Márquez Montesinos JCE, Meneguin AB, et al. Chitosan and HPMCAS double-coating as protective systems for alginate microparticles loaded with Ctx(Ile21)-Ha antimicrobial peptide to prevent intestinal infections. Biomaterials. 2023;293:121978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121978
53. Тихонов С. Л., Чернуха И. М. Функциональная направленность природных и синтезированных биопептидов. Екатеринбург: Уральский государственный лесотехнический университет и Уральский государственный аграрный университет, 2024. 212 с.
54. Raucher D, Ryu JS. Cell-penetrating peptides: Strategies for anticancer treatment. Trends in Molecular Medicine. 2015;21(9):560–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2015.06.005
55. Douat C, Aisenbrey C, Antunes S, Decossas M, Lambert O, et al. A cell-penetrating foldamer with a bioreducible linkage for intracellular delivery of DNA. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2015;54(38):11133–11137. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201504884
56. Xie J, Bi Y, Zhang H, Dong S, Teng L, et al. Cell-penetrating peptides in diagnosis and treatment of human diseases: From preclinical research to clinical application. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2020;11:697. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.00697
57. Copolovici DM, Langel K, Eriste E, Langel U. Cell-penetrating peptides: Design, synthesis, and applications. ACS Nano. 2014;8(3):1972–1994. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn4057269
58. Wang T, Li H, Liang C, Sun S, Liu A, et al. Purification and characterization of a novel antioxidant Phelligridin LA produced by Inonotus baumii. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology. 2020;95(9):2483–2494. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.6430
59. Валиева Ш. С., Тихонов С. Л., Тихонова Н. В., Тимофеева М. С., Ногина А. А. Синтез и экспрессия устойчивого к протеолизу, предупреждающего процессы старения нового рекомбинантного пищевого белка. АПК России. 2024. Т. 31. № 4. С. 607–613. https://doi.org/10.55934/2587-8824-2024-31-4-607-613
60. Zenin V, Tsedilin A, Yurkova M, Siniavin A, Fedorov A. Thermostable chaperone-based polypeptide biopolymer. PLOS One. 2023;18(6):e0286752. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286752
61. Deng C, Wu J, Cheng R, Meng F, Klok H-A, et al. Functional polypeptide and hybrid materials: Precision synthesis via α-amino acid N-carboxyanhydride polymerization and emerging biomedical applications. Progress in Polymer Science. 2014;39(2):330–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.10.008
62. Collins JM, Singh SK, White TA, Cesta DJ, Simpson CL, et al. Total wash elimination for solid phase peptide synthesis. Nature Communications. 2023;14(1):8168. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-44074-5
63. Liu Y, Li D, Ding J, Chen X. Controlled synthesis of polypeptides. Chinese Chemical Letters. 2020;31(12):3001–3014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2020.04.029
64. Varnava KG, Sarojini V. Making solid-phase peptide synthesis greener: A review of the literature. Chemistry an Asian Journal. 2019;14(8):1088–1097. https://doi.org/10.1002/asia.201801807
65. Lee YS. Gram-scale preparation of C-terminal-modified enkephalin analogues by typical liquid-phase peptide synthesis. Current Protocols in Protein Science. 2019;98(1):e97. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpps.97
66. Xu J, Wang F, Ye L, Wang R, Zhao L, et al. Penetrating peptides: Applications in drug delivery. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology. 2023;84:104475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2023.104475
67. Kang Z, Ding G, Meng Z, Meng Q. The rational design of cell-penetrating peptides for application in delivery systems. Peptides. 2019;121:170149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2019.170149
68. Ruseska I, Zimmer A. Internalization mechanisms of cell-penetrating peptides. Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology. 2020;11:101–123. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.11.10
69. Cheng X, Chen K, Dong B, Yang M, Filbrun SL, et al. Dynamin-dependent vesicle twist at the final stage of clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Nature Cell Biology. 2021;23(8):859–869. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-021-00713-x
70. Liu Y, Shen Z, Xu Y, Zhu Y-W, Chen W, et al. Layer-by-layer self-assembly of PLL/CPP-ACP multilayer on SLA titanium surface: Enhancing osseointegration and antibacterial activity in vitro and in vivo. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 2024;240:113966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2024.113966
71. Salloum G, Bresnick AR, Backer JM. Macropinocytosis: Mechanisms and regulation. Biochemical Journal. 2023;480(5):335–362. https://doi.org/10.1042/bcj20210584
72. Kim GC, Cheon DH, Lee Y. Challenge to overcome current limitations of cell-penetrating peptides. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) – Proteins and Proteomics. 2021;1869(4):140604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbapap.2021.140604
73. Kaplan IM, Wadia JS, Dowdy SF. Cationic TAT peptide transduction domain enters cells by macropinocytosis. Journal of Controlled Release. 2005;102(1):247–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.10.018
74. Eiriksdottir E, Mäger I, El Andaloussi S, Langel U, Lehto T. Cellular internalization kinetics of (luciferin-) cell-penetrating peptide conjugates. Bioconjugate Chemistry. 2010;21(9):1662–1672. https://doi.org/10.1021/bc100174y
75. Fittipaldi A, Ferrari A, Zoppé M, Arcangeli C, Pellegrini V, et al. Cell membrane lipid rafts mediate caveolar endocytosis of HIV-1 Tat fusion proteins. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2003;278(36):34141–34149. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M303045200
76. Mäger I, Langel K, Lehto T, Eiríksdóttir E, Langel Ü. The role of endocytosis on the uptake kinetics of luciferin-conjugated cell-penetrating peptides. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) – Biomembranes. 2012;1818(3):502–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.11.020
77. Richard JP, Melikov K, Brooks H, Prevot P, Lebleu B, et al. Cellular uptake of unconjugated TAT peptide involves clathrin-dependent endocytosis and heparan sulfate receptors. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2005;280(15):15300–15306. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M401604200
78. Nakase I, Tadokoro A, Kawabata N, Takeuchi T, Katoh H, et al. Interaction of arginine-rich peptides with membrane-associated proteoglycans is crucial for induction of actin organization and macropinocytosis. Biochemistry. 2007;46(2):492–501. doihttps://doi.org/10.1021/bi0612824.
79. Subrizi A, Tuominen E, Bunker A, Róg T, Antopolsky M, et al. Tat(48-60) peptide amino acid sequence is not unique in its cell penetrating properties and cell-surface glycosaminoglycans inhibit its cellular uptake. Journal of Controlled Release. 2012;158(2):277–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.11.007
80. Wallbrecher R, Ackels T, Olea RA, Klein MJ, Caillon L, et al. Membrane permeation of arginine-rich cell-penetrating peptides independent of transmembrane potential as a function of lipid composition and membrane fluidity. Journal of Controlled Release. 2017;256:68–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.04.013
81. Szabő I, Mező G,Yousef MA, Soltész D, Bató C, et al. Redesigning of cell-penetrating peptides to improve their efficacy as a drug delivery system. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(5):907. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14050907
82. Jiao C-Y, Delaroche D, Burlina F, Alves ID, Chassaing G, et al. Translocation and endocytosis for cell-penetrating peptide internalization. Journal Biological Chemistry. 2009;284(49):33957–33965. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.056309
83. Li L, Vorobyov I, Allen TW. The different interactions of lysine and arginine side chains with lipid membranes. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2013;117(40):11906–11920. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp405418y
84. Pirhaghi M, Mamashli F, Moosavi-Movahedi F, Arghavani P, Amiri A, et al. Cell-penetrating peptides: Promising therapeutics and drug-delivery systems for neurodegenerative diseases. Molecular Pharmaceutics. 2024;21(5):2097–2117. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.3c01167
85. Zakany F, Mándity IM, Varga Z, Panyi G, Nagy P, et al. Effect of the lipid landscape on the efficacy of cell-penetrating peptides. Cells. 2023;12(13):1700. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12131700
86. Byrne J, Huang H-W, McRae JC, Babaee S, Soltani A, et al. Devices for drug delivery in the gastrointestinal tract: A review of systems physically interacting with the mucosa for enhanced delivery. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2021;177:113940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2021.113926
87. Homayun B, Lin X, Choi H-J. Challenges and recent progress in oral drug delivery systems for biopharmaceuticals. Pharmaceutics. 2019;11(3):129. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics11030129
88. Vazquez-Uribe R, Hedin KA, Licht TR, Nieuwdorp M, Sommer MOA. Advanced microbiome therapeutics as a novel modality for oral delivery of peptides to manage metabolic diseases. Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2024;35(9):779–791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2024.04.021
89. Hedin KA, Rees VM, Zhang H, Kruse V, Vazquez-Uribe R, et al. Effects of broad-spectrum antibiotics on the colonisation of probiotic yeast Saccharomyces boulardii in the murine gastrointestinal tract. Scientific Reports. 2022;12(1):8862. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12806-0
90. Vaaben TH, Vazquez-Uribe R, Sommer MOA. Characterization of eight bacterial biosensors for microbial diagnostic and therapeutic applications. ACS Synthetic Biology. 2022;11(12):4184–4193. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.2c00491
91. Redden H, Morse N, Alper HS. The synthetic biology toolbox for tuning gene expression in yeast. FEMS Yeast Res. 2015;15(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/1567-1364.12188
92. Sands C, Hedin KA, Vazquez-Uribe R, Sommer MOA. Saccharomyces boulardii promoters for control of gene expression in vivo. Microbial Cell Factories. 2024;23(1):16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-023-02288-8
93. Armetta J, Schantz-Klausen M, Shepelin D, Vazquez-Uribe R, Bahl MI. Escherichia coli promoters with consistent expression throughout the murine gut. ACS Synthetic Biology. 2021;10(12):3359–3367. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.1c00325
94. Durmusoglu D, Naldi M, Parolin C, Erdoğan Ü, Bartolini M, et al. Improving therapeutic protein secretion in the probiotic yeast Saccharomyces boulardii using a multifactorial engineering approach. Microbial Cell Factories. 2023;22(1):45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-023-02053-x
95. Santos-Navarro FN, Vignoni A, Boada Y, Pico J. RBS and promoter strengths determine the cell-growth-dependent protein mass fractions and their optimal synthesis rates. ACS Synthetic Biology. 2021;10(12):3297–3308. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.1c00131
96. Oesterle S, Gerngross D, Schmitt S, Roberts TM, Panke S. Efficient engineering of chromosomal ribosome binding site libraries in mismatch repair proficient Escherichia coli. Scientific Reports. 2017;7(1):123. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12395-3
97. Felippes de FF, Mchale M, Doran RL, Roden S, Eamens AL, et al. The key role of terminators on the expression and posttranscriptional gene silencing of transgenes. The Plant Journal. 2020;104(1):96–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14907
98. Bose A, Wong TW, Singh N. Formulation development and optimization of sustained release matrix tablet of Itopride HCl by response surface methodology and its evaluation of release kinetics. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal. 2013;21(2):201–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2012.03.006
99. Reddy N, Reddy R, Jiang Q. Crosslinking biopolymers for biomedical applications. Trends in Biotechnology. 2015;33(6):362–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.03.008
100. Jiang G, Woo BH, Kang F, Singh J, Deluca PP. Assessment of protein release kinetics, stability and protein polymer interaction of lysozyme encapsulated poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres. Journal of Controlled Release. 2002;79(1-3):137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-3659(01)00533-8
101. Charbonneau MR, Isabella VM, Li N, Kurtz CB. Developing a new class of engineered live bacterial therapeutics to treat human diseases. Nature Communications. 2020;11(1):1738. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15508-1
102. Brennan AM. Development of synthetic biotics as treatment for human diseases. Synthetic Biology. 2022;7(1):ysac014. https://doi.org/10.1093/synbio/ysac001
103. Ozdemir T, Fedorec AJH, Barnes CP, Danino T, et al. Synthetic biology and engineered live biotherapeutics: Toward increasing system complexity. Cell Systems. 2018;7(1):5–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2018.06.008
104. Heavey MK, Durmusoglu D, Crook N, Anselmo AC. Discovery and delivery strategies for engineered live biotherapeutic products. Trends Biotechnol. 2022;40(3):354–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2021.08.002
105. Rutter JW, Dekker L, Owen KA, Barnes CP. Microbiome engineering: Engineered live biotherapeutic products for treating human disease. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2022;10:892087. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.1000873
106. Chien T, Harimoto T, Kepecs B, Gray K, Coker C, et al. Enhancing the tropism of bacteria via genetically programmed biosensors. Nature Biomedical Engineering. 2022;6(9):1052–1063. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-021-00772-3
107. Armstrong A, Isalan M. Engineering bacterial theranostics: From logic gates to in vivo applications. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2022;10:892087. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1437301
108. Hedin KA, Kruse V, Vazquez-Uribe R, Sommer MOA. Biocontainment strategies for in vivo applications of Saccharomyces boulardii. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2023;11:1136095. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1136095
109. Ma Y, Manna A, Moon TS. Advances in engineering genetic circuits for microbial biocontainment. Current Opinion in Systems Biology. 2021;36:100483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coisb.2023.100483
110. Arnold JA, Glazier J, Mimee M. Genetic engineering of resident bacteria in the gut microbiome. Journal of Bacteriol. 2023;205(7):e0012723. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00127-23
111. Hayashi N, Lai Y, Fuerte-Stone J, Mimee M, Lu TK. Cas9-assisted biological containment of a genetically engineered human commensal bacterium and genetic elements. Nature Communications. 2024;15(1):2096. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-45893-w
112. Xing H, Liu X, Wang JU, Zhou T, Jin X, et al. Magnetically targeted delivery of probiotics for controlled residence and accumulation in the intestine. Nanoscale. 2025;17(15):8588–8598. https://doi.org/10.1039/d4nr04753b
113. Charbonneau MR, Denney WS, Horvath NG, Cantarella P, Castillo MJ, et al. Development of a mechanistic model to predict synthetic biotic activity in healthy volunteers and patients with phenylketonuria. Communications Biology. 2021;4(1):89. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-02183-1
114. Cone RA. Barrier properties of mucus. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2009;61(2):75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2008.09.008
115. Chen M-C, Sonaje K, Chen K-J, Sung H-W. A review of the prospects for polymeric nanoparticle platforms in oral insulin delivery. Biomaterials. 2011;32(36):9826–9838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.087
116. Zizzari AT, Pliatsika D, Gall FM, Fischer T, Riedl R. New perspectives in oral peptidomimetic delivery. Drug Discovery Today. 2021;26(4):1097–1105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2021.01.020
